Post by Zach on Oct 7, 2020 6:06:22 GMT
Just some quick shots from the blog:
These models all utilize the unit organizing system that I used in my Wagram game, but simplified and genericized. I'm working on a set of tournament-style rules that lets you design your own army using these pre-labeled game pieces, so the OOB information has some in game effect. I'm hoping to get those done sooner rather than later, because my work load is going to shoot up around the holidays. Which is also the timeframe when I'm hoping to get the new FMS store up and running. It'll be an interesting few months coming up, for sure.
But that said, I'm pretty happy with how these came out, and with how they printed up. I printed up 60 pieces of a re-design of the old cavalry last night. The flags need to be re-designed, and I feel like the OOB system I used for the cavalry isn't quite as thorough as the system I used for the infantry. I may have to re-think them a bit.
Here's a preview of the cavalry that I just inked (still wet!) for feedback. I really want to keep the letters on there so that you can tell at a glance what sort of cavalry they represent. This is sort of fundamental. But The number coding would have to represent not only corps/division organization, but sub-corps assets that are controlled by individual corps commanders.
But as I'm thinking about it, this might be ok. I may be over thinking it?
These models all utilize the unit organizing system that I used in my Wagram game, but simplified and genericized. I'm working on a set of tournament-style rules that lets you design your own army using these pre-labeled game pieces, so the OOB information has some in game effect. I'm hoping to get those done sooner rather than later, because my work load is going to shoot up around the holidays. Which is also the timeframe when I'm hoping to get the new FMS store up and running. It'll be an interesting few months coming up, for sure.
But that said, I'm pretty happy with how these came out, and with how they printed up. I printed up 60 pieces of a re-design of the old cavalry last night. The flags need to be re-designed, and I feel like the OOB system I used for the cavalry isn't quite as thorough as the system I used for the infantry. I may have to re-think them a bit.
Here's a preview of the cavalry that I just inked (still wet!) for feedback. I really want to keep the letters on there so that you can tell at a glance what sort of cavalry they represent. This is sort of fundamental. But The number coding would have to represent not only corps/division organization, but sub-corps assets that are controlled by individual corps commanders.
But as I'm thinking about it, this might be ok. I may be over thinking it?
